@administration thank you for the info. We need to dump Fantom and move on asap. Time is money and our token price is low. We should pounce on either Optimism or Base. Base is likely going to be huge. But either choice is a great move. Time to move on. I feel we need Bricher to be updated asap on BNB as well. Any new chain choice should be the one easiest for your developers to add Bricher to be used in that network as well instead of just BNB only. Good luck and keep up the great work!
@godofshiba It may be worth considering utilizing flash loans from Pancake Swap rather than creating your own. This approach can potentially offer the same benefits without the additional resources and time required to develop and maintain your own flash loan system.
Its a dead stable coin. We should get away from it completely and just stick with USDC and Tether for now.
Due to global regulators attacking CZ which is BNB really, we should be cautious and begin expanding to more chains quickly in case anything happens to BNB. I feel if BNB goes down Trava is done for since most of its utility is on that chain. That's a huge risk that the team cannot control that has nothing to do with Trava and its investors so we should protect accordingly and diversify.
Adding more new chains.
Having BNB, ETH, and FTM is great. But, more are needed. Maybe we could put out voting for this issue and which ones to choose. The other issue is most Trava features are just for the BNB chain. ETH and FTM chain users should have all the same feature use as BNB. If they did I feel the TVL on these chains would increase drastically.
Agree, there will be pulsechain, fork eth 2.0 much cheaper and faster than eth or polygon matic, and cosmos are cheap aswell and fast, matic is strong project
Trava capital needs a lot of help. It is impossible to understand what money in reserves is actually there. Also what is the actual token circulation count? Coinmarketcap and Coingecko need updates on the token since the price is not tracked anymore. No way for investors to know what the value per token is based off of reserve assets. There should be a visually easy view of token reserves or investments along with their daily market price then divided amongst the circulation we now all know the value per token. I feel a team is needed just for this protocol and if there is one and that's all they do, then we need more folks. We also need more communication. My biggest fear for Trava capital it seems to be a blatant or obvious security or stock share the way it is designed now. Being from the USA I may not be allowed to trade these in the future unfortunately.
Thats point, Team should not, skip this kinda situation, its looks bad on view, when tokens is just non tracked. Also we dont know how money left for investing, etc
We need more partnership with project, some ama with other group/teams for marketing trava capital and trava token.
Trava should use some of the transaction fees earned to complete monthly or quarterly burn of the original amount of minted Trava. This should stay in place permanently. This will only make the price of Trava more valuable.
Thats not bad idea, for price token, but honestly i prefer keep money for marketing with others project/people ama's partnerships etc, in social media is silent, i had proposal fore crew 3 but aswell is silent about this idea, we dont have much retweets/likes on tt page compare for followers, dunno why.
Also we waiting still for ama with team for more information and team vision about future Tod and Trava.
@rudy HI rudy. Do you mean using the total value lock in our lending pool to be a liquidity in swapping pair token on pancake swap? The main idea of DEFI 2.0 is creating more profit from the locked balance in a defi project. We are researching the mechanism to do that, but it takes time. The detail will be published to discuss on our Forum, AMA or Meet up in the future