@annietrava thank you for getting back to me. I just tried again and it is not showing up on the screen it is blank still.

https://app.trava.finance/bridge/cross-chain-swap

@kumpis @Kenzo Thank you for your ideas. What you propose are useful features that every users would like to have. We surely should implement those features. But we need to consider where to place the features, inside or outside BRicher.

BRicher is a part of TRAVA ecosystem and it can greatly facilitate other TRAVA DApps. However, we do not restrict the effectiveness of BRicher in TRAVA only. We would like to go further and support all blockchain users to be richer.

This was discussed in Telegram.

We can still invest in the 3 top coins (lowest risk), while still earning revenue.

BTCB/BNB LP
ETH/BTCB LP
BNB/ETH LP

On pancakeswap, gives us great exposure to the top coins and earning 5-10% APY.

Seems like the most logical choice during current market conditions.

Hence voting for LP pairs makes complete sense.

@rudy HI rudy. Do you mean using the total value lock in our lending pool to be a liquidity in swapping pair token on pancake swap? The main idea of DEFI 2.0 is creating more profit from the locked balance in a defi project. We are researching the mechanism to do that, but it takes time. The detail will be published to discuss on our Forum, AMA or Meet up in the future

I think the ceiling price it is a good idea, it will help more bidders can join in the auction

@thangtrava I support this idea, bridge for rTRAVA should be implemented

@jasonmar Of course, we want to use Wallet Reputation for all features in TraDAO protocol 😉

@shelterswap That's sound great. Can you give me some more detail explaination for this idea?

@chloexav Yes. Thank you for your suggestion about the new proposal. i will check and update for it. Do you have any idea to make TRAVA in lending pool more effective?

there are more than 14 assets in Lending pool now, I wonder when Trava or TOD would be added to, thing it would benefit trava holders alot.

@icezick It's a good idea but maybe it will make the competition among bidders more aggressively because bidders have to bid quickly before the sellers close the auction

@bigben We are having staked version of TOD. Interestingly, it's name is xTOD. Using xTOD to deposit into the lending pool is completely possible. But using xTOD as collateral and borrowing other tokens, for example USDT, requires a lot of consideration. Because TOD is currently still a token with large price fluctuations, a whale can push the price of TOD very high to borrow a large amount of USDT and then dump the TOD price. They will receive a large amount of USDT and the lending pool will be affected. It's also a mechanism used in a lot of recent lending pool hacks. We are trying to create more utilities for TOD and xTOD. Hope it's works well! 👍

@bigben It sounds good. Unfortunately, we cannot do it. Let's me explain! As far as I know, we have 2 ways to implement your idea:

The TOD contract must support this function, but TOD contract cannot be upgraded. We don't code and deploy our contract like that because I think no one trusts a project with a token contract can be changed. We have to implement a DEX like PancakeSwap and add tax feature to it. We definitely do it for sure. However, people still buy and sell TOD on PancakeSwap so the DEX we implemented make no sense 😢

@victoriaph Actually, other OHM folks projects are doing something like this. They are investing to new projects or depositing to other vault, lending pools. Profits from those actions will be shared with their users. I think it's a good idea to make our Treasury become bigger 👍

What APY do you guys expect? Do you want us create a snapshot voting??? 😊