@hathorcomfy that makes sense. I also am concerned with the exposure to BNB. These past few months have shown there could be a collapse of the chain if its ever found that Binance is having financial difficulties or serious legal issues. I feel we should maybe increase our exposure to just ETH and BTC instead and minority stake in BNB. Also it may be wise to follow what Iron Bank has done and keep adding more networks for the platform use. Avax, Algo, etc., in case BNB falls it won't harm Trava as bad. Currently most of the transactions on Trava are on the BNB chain. FTM is great on Trava, but the ETH chain is having issues and is the most expensive way to make defi transactions.

I am still unable to claim my trava staking rewards on the eth network. I was able to remove my staked amount affordably but when I try to claim my rewards for the past 45 days it says $1,500 in gas fees. It seems to be an issue on the code. Is anyone from Trava going to respond to this? It seems you guys built this forum but no longer visit it or respond?

@annietrava thank you for getting back to me. I just tried again and it is not showing up on the screen it is blank still.

https://app.trava.finance/bridge/cross-chain-swap

@kumpis @Kenzo Thank you for your ideas. What you propose are useful features that every users would like to have. We surely should implement those features. But we need to consider where to place the features, inside or outside BRicher.

BRicher is a part of TRAVA ecosystem and it can greatly facilitate other TRAVA DApps. However, we do not restrict the effectiveness of BRicher in TRAVA only. We would like to go further and support all blockchain users to be richer.

This was discussed in Telegram.

We can still invest in the 3 top coins (lowest risk), while still earning revenue.

BTCB/BNB LP
ETH/BTCB LP
BNB/ETH LP

On pancakeswap, gives us great exposure to the top coins and earning 5-10% APY.

Seems like the most logical choice during current market conditions.

Hence voting for LP pairs makes complete sense.

@rudy HI rudy. Do you mean using the total value lock in our lending pool to be a liquidity in swapping pair token on pancake swap? The main idea of DEFI 2.0 is creating more profit from the locked balance in a defi project. We are researching the mechanism to do that, but it takes time. The detail will be published to discuss on our Forum, AMA or Meet up in the future

I think the ceiling price it is a good idea, it will help more bidders can join in the auction

@thangtrava I support this idea, bridge for rTRAVA should be implemented

@jasonmar Of course, we want to use Wallet Reputation for all features in TraDAO protocol 😉

@shelterswap That's sound great. Can you give me some more detail explaination for this idea?

@chloexav Yes. Thank you for your suggestion about the new proposal. i will check and update for it. Do you have any idea to make TRAVA in lending pool more effective?

there are more than 14 assets in Lending pool now, I wonder when Trava or TOD would be added to, thing it would benefit trava holders alot.

@icezick It's a good idea but maybe it will make the competition among bidders more aggressively because bidders have to bid quickly before the sellers close the auction

@bigben We are having staked version of TOD. Interestingly, it's name is xTOD. Using xTOD to deposit into the lending pool is completely possible. But using xTOD as collateral and borrowing other tokens, for example USDT, requires a lot of consideration. Because TOD is currently still a token with large price fluctuations, a whale can push the price of TOD very high to borrow a large amount of USDT and then dump the TOD price. They will receive a large amount of USDT and the lending pool will be affected. It's also a mechanism used in a lot of recent lending pool hacks. We are trying to create more utilities for TOD and xTOD. Hope it's works well! 👍